John Perins in Maryland Before the Indian War
John Perrin or Perins is the first person in this narrative to be a certain ancestor of mine. Important information about him is uncertain or unknown; in this section I begin the description of what I know, proceeding chronologically. The next section will continue the narrative starting with the Indican War. Finally I will conclude with my personal speculations regarding the origini of this man.
In these two sections I will wrte "Perins" when I am referring to the subject of this and the next section. I will use the word "Perrin" whenever a name is recorded with that spelling in an official document I reference.
Background: Central Maryland in 1732
Before introducing John Perins in 1737 I have a lot of background to establish. Bear with me.
Geography
Best to start with the geography of central Maryland. The map below should help with orientation.
This portion of Maryland lies in the Great Valley, an ancient shoreline which extends from Pennsylvania to North Carolina through Maryland and Virginia. The bedrock of the Great Valley is Cambrian and Ordovician limestone, rock easily carved out by water. Underground streams and sinkholes can result. In the Maryland portion of the Great Valley the Conococheague and Antietam Creeks drain its west and east sides. The middle portion of the Valley is quite flat and does not have good surface drainage; its only stream, Marsh Run, does not possess a real creek bed until its last mile to the Potomac.
The hills to the east of the Great Valley were known locally as South Mountain; those to the west as North Mountain.
Colonial Government
Until 1749 all of central Maryland was part of Prince Georges County which stretched from the Patuxent River westward through the valleys of Rock Creek and Monocacy Creek (site of present day Frederick, Maryland), across South Mountain and finally the Great Valley. The County seat, Upper Marlboro, lay on the Patuxent, a full 60 miles east of present Hagerstown as the crow files. In 1749 the new county of Frederick was formed. Finally in 1776 the Great Valley portion of Frederick County became Washington County.
As the frontier portion of Maryland did not produce tobacco, it did not fit well into the economy of the colony. Since tobacco was used as currency, dealings on the frontier were often by barter, with IOUs more common than cash. Taxation was particularly tricky; not only were there standard taxes to collect, there was the squirrel and crow tax. This levy, enacted in 1728 Arch. Md. 36: 278 was to be paid annually with either three squirrel scalps or three crow's heads. Failure to submit the required numbers of vermin meant a fine of two pounds of tobacco.
The Maryland colonial Land Office was much more efficient than its counterpart in Pennsylvania. It sold land warrants to individuals for a specified number of acres; these warrants would allow a person to survey land and submit the survey to the Office for a patent on that land. The Office could refuse to patent a tract if the land was already taken, or if filing fees were not paid. In colonial times it was common for landed individuals to request a resurvey of their land, a proccess not requiring an additional warrant, to take up contiguous land not already patented.
Indians
Indian presence in central Maryland was documented only obliquely. Traders such as Israel Friend lived among them as early as 1722 Corinne Hanna Diller, "Early Traders on the Upper Potomac", Western Maryland Genealogy 19 (2003): 67-90. The full text of that article is here. In 1727 he received a deed from the Indians for land at the mouth of Antietam CreekPG Co. Deeds Q: 169:
Att the request of George Beall the Following Deed was Enrolled November the Twenty Seventh Anno DM. Seventeen hundred and thirty whereas be it known to all Manner of persons to whom it may concern That We Cunnaw cha ha la, Taw we Maw, Capt. Sivility, Toile Flangee, She Hays, Callakahahatt, being Kings and rulers of the Five nations for naturall Love and we bar to our Brothers Israel Friend we give unto him...
and Heirs Executors Administrators and Assign's a certain piece of Land lying and being upon potomock River beginning at the mouth of Andietum Creek at Box Elder marked with three notches on every side and to run up the said river two hundred shoots as fur as an arrow can be slung out of a bow and yn. to be one hundreed shoots right back from the river so containing its square till it intercedes with the said Creek again with a I'land against the mouth of the Creek which said Land we the said Indians and our heirs Doe warrant and for Ever Defend unto the said Israel Friend ... with all the appertenences thereunto belonging, as fishing, hawking, Hunting, and all other privileges thereunto belonging with paying unto some of us two [eares] of Indian Corn for ever, this tenth day of January One thousand seven hundred and twenty seven. Signed, sealed, and Delivered in the presence of Humberston Lyon, g.h. Margalith.
Friend's deed was witnessed by Humberston Lyon, another early pioneer. The signers of the deed included Captain Civility, a Susquehannak chief from Conestoga. Civility later wrote to the Governor of Maryland concerning frontier settlements; although whether he was referring to the area contested in Cresap's war, or to present day Maryland, is not entirely clearArch. Md. (Proceedings of the Council of Maryland, 1732:1752) 28: 10-11:
To Your Excellency the Governor living in Annapolis with Great Care These
January the 12, 1731/2
To your Excellency of Maryland and Esqr Lloyd, and if it please You Sir I Captain Civility makes bold with these few Lines, for I am heartily sorry to hear as Maryland should deprive us of that Spot of Land as we have held hitherto for I certainly did hear as their Intention is to take it from Us if possible but I hear You intend to come and run Land out above Andahetem, and I heartily desire you not to do it for You have already run Land out at Cohungaruto and put your family to live there which We are very much disturbed and I would have you not to press too much upon Us for We have give no body Land yet but Israel Friend at the mouth of Andahetem and I shall consider with the rest of my Brothers what to do for as We are but Indians You must not think to force Us out of Our own No more at present but We remain Your Servants all the five Nations
his
Captain + Civility
mark
his
Toyl HT Hangue
mark
Although there was no legal white settlement in Maryland west of the Monocacy River in 1734, European presence was sufficient to conceivably interfere with Indian movements north and south. Samuel Blunston, Justice of the Peace in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania wrote to Governor Gordon of Pennsylvania in August, 1734 to explain the following incident Pa. Arch. Series 1, I: 437:
About a month Agoe a party of the Six Nations, Warriors, came to the Connoi Town in their way to the Southward, & in the name of the rest, five or Six came to my house & Brought a List of forty, the number going to war. They told me they wanted a paper to take with them through Virginia, to Show the Inhabitants that their Intentions towards the English were peaceable, which paper I supose they Intended to be for the passport mentioned in the Governour of Virginia's Letter; made Nessessary by the treaty, (tho' this I knew not Before,) upon their Application to me I advised them to wait upon thee who only had the Right & power to give them such a paper; but that they said was so far out of their way they could not goe & Insisted upon Something from mee, So Considering if I denyed them a paper they would go without, I rather Chose to write to Edmd Cartlidge a few lines to this Effect, "that forty of the Six Nation's Indians Intending to go to the Southward, Desired a Certificate from me to Show the white people that their Intention was not to do them any hurt, but to pass peaceably along, & that they need not be afraid of them," And I desired Edmund Cartlidge to let them know they must Suffer no Violence to be used towards any person, nor that they shd not forceably take any thing, And that if He thought propper he might give a Certificate of their peaceable Intentions, which they proposed by sending one person Before to Show the Inhabitants that they might not be frighted. If in this I acted Amis or Inadvertantly I shal be Sorry, for I Intended it for Good.
Stories told in the nineteenth century described Indian activity at the mouths of Antietam and Conocoheague Creeks in the 1730s Samuel Kercheval, A History of the Valley of Virginia (Woodstock, VA: John Gatewood, Printer, 1833; republished Westminster, MD: Heritage Books, 2007), 31-32.:
At the mouth of Antietam, a small creek on the Maryland side of the river [Potomac, or Cohongoruton], a most bloody affair took place between parties of the Catawba and Delaware tribes. This was probably about the year 1736. The Delawares had penetrated pretty far to the south, committed some acts of outrage on the Catawbas, and on their retreat were overtaken at the mouth of this creek, when a desperate conflict ensured. Every man of the Delaware party was put to death, with the exception of one who escaped after the battle was over, and every Catawba held up a scalp but one. This was a disgrace not to be borne; and he instantly gave chase to the fugitive, overtook him at the Susquehanna river, (a distance little short of one hundred miles,) killed and scalped him, and returning, showed his scalp to several white people, and exulted in what he had done.
"Another most bloody battle was fought at the mouth of Conococheague, on Friend's land, in which but one Delaware escaped death, and he ran in to Friend's house, when the family shut the door, and kept the Catawbas out, by which means the poor fugitive was saved.
Settlement, 1734 - 1736
While technically illegal, there is ample evidence that Europeans were settling in central Maryland by 1733-34. The names of these folks come from three sources.
Monocacy Hundred in 1733
The first extant list of the occupants of central Maryland is a list of taxables in Monocosie Hundred, 1733 Maryland State Papers No. 1, The Black Books, paragraph 272.. It includes 109 names plus three slaves. While most of the people on this list live east of our area of interest, I can separate out the names of some people known to later live west of South Mountain:
Edmund Cartledge | Thomas Cherry | William Clarke | James Coburn |
Redmond Falling | Charles Friend | John Friend | Nich. Friend |
Humburston Lyon | Edward Nickolls | John Nichols | Robert Ratcliffe |
John Royal | William Searwell, Jr. | William Sheppard, Junr. | James Spurgeon |
John Stull | William Shoarwell | William Spurgeon | John Upton |
Blunston Letter, 1734
A petition written to Samuel Blunston and dated the 28th day, 5th month (July) of 1734 Pa. Arch. Series III, 1: 39; from Minute Book K reads:
Mr. Samuel Blunston Sr. this is to let you understand that the Inhabitants about the great Marsh where Edmund Cartledge does live have met and made a general Conclusion for to get grants from you for to settle any where upon the Waters of Conehecheegoe and likewise upon the Waters of Andiatom on the North side of the line that George Noble and John Smith did run.
Joseph Hickman Edward Parnell John Dobkin James Conron John Hodge Redman Fallen James Gill Thomas Cherry John Williams William Clarke William Varnell Thomas Owen Charles Friend Abraham Fish James Hendrica William Sherwell Peter Hart Humbleston Lyon Thomas Oncall Nicholas Hammon Richard Spencer Samuel Baldwin John Surfurance Samuel Owen Francis Hickman Joseph Hickman Jun'r John Stull Edmund Cartledge Jun'r John Nicholas Edward Nicholas John Gosedge Neils Friend John Friend John Gladin Charles Smith John Ryle James Coborn William May John Sawphorus James Williams
I have not been able to conclusively find where the Noble & Smith line ran; it may have approximated the later Mason & Dixon line, or perhaps been further south. So why did these people petition the Pennsylvania authorities for permission to obtain land grants? Since this was the time of the Pennsylvania - Maryland boundary dispute, and since the area was west of the Susquehanna, no one actually knew for certain which colony they would be in. In 1734 Maryland was not issuing many warrants for land in the far west to ordinary people, instead it surveyed large land grants such as Conococheague Manor (for Lord Baltimore) and Chews Manor (for Samuel Chew, son in law of Philemon Lloyd, Secretary of the Colony) Edward C. Papenfuse, Biographical Dictionary of the Maryland Legislature 1635-1789, Arch. Md. 426: 218). Therefore people already in the land had every reason to fear that Maryland would never sell them land, but to make it necessary for them to rent as tenants.
Many of the signers on the 1734 petition came from families originally found in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. The trading escapades of Edward or Edmund Cartledge were discussed in the last section; both he and his son signed the petition. James Hendrica was probably James Hendricks; this name as well as the names William Clarke, William Sherwell and Samuel Baldwin are also found in the 1718 tax records of Conestoga, Lancaster County.
Tax Records
The first volume of Prince Georges County tax records includes information from the years 1734 - 8. While incomplete for 1734 - 5, there are a few pieces of information of interest from that time. Edmund Cartledge served on a jury for two days in September, 1734 PG Co. Tax Levy A:20. Edmund Cartledge, Edmund Cartledge, Jr. and Umbertson Lyon all received payments of several hundred pounds of tobacco for killing wolves PG Co. Tax Levy A:44.
In 1736 the sheriff was instructed to collect fines from those people who failed to pay the squirrel and crow bounty in 1735. In this list of 169 names I can identify thirteen persons who were known to live in central Maryland PG Co. Tax Levy A:57:
Humbertson Lyon | Joseph Hickman | Edward Nicholls | James Coburn | Neale Friend |
James Kendrick | John Upton | John Stull | William Spurgin | William Sheppard Sen. |
Robert Ratcliffe | Redmond Folling | William Chapline |
. The first ten names listed above occurred as a group within this list; similarly, the last three names were grouped together. This suggests to me that when these lists were compiled for the sheriff, the names were grouped by locale. This ordering apparently occurs in the lists compiled for the sheriff in later years as well, and will prove helpful in my analysis.
Settlement on the Potomac and around the Great Marsh
From the three sources cited above I see two foci of early settlement in central Maryland. The first focus is the Potomac River. The Spurgeon brothers, fresh from their time as indentured servants, settled just upstream from Antietam Creek. More about this family later. Charles Friend, the son of Israel Friend, settled with his family at the mouth of Conocoheague Creek. Both the Spurgeons and Friend would buy or patent land later, but their presence was noted on a map drawn in December, 1736 for Lord Farifax of Virginia (More information on the people shown here can be found in the article "New Look at an Old Map" reprinted here).

Portion of "Map of the northern neck in Virginia", 1736/7, William Mayo, surveyorfrom James W. Foster, "Maps of the First Survey of the Potomac River, 1736 - 1737"William and Mary College Quarterly Historical Magazine Series II, 18 (1938): 149
Please note the "Waggon Road to Philadelphia" on this map. This road was a continuation of the road from Lancaster to York, Pennsylvania. In Maryland it passed through Frederick, turned west and crossed South Mountain, then went south to the Potomac River. Its full route can be seen in the map above. William Sheppard, and later Van Swearingen See Moses Chaplin's will, Fred. Co., Md. WIlls A#1:182-4, 1762, ran ferries at the Potomac crossing.
The other focus of settlement was the "great Marsh" which was undoubtedly the upper portion of present day Marsh Creek. Edmund Cartledge, at this point retired from his fur trading days in Pennsylvania, was responsible for the survey of Fountain Rock in 1737 MSA S1226-152; Unpatented Certificate: 143 (PG Co.). While not patented, this location can be found in the 1877 Washington County atlas at the village of St. James Lake, Griffing & Stevenson, Illustrated Atlas of Washington County (Philadelphia: H. J. Toudy, 1877) . The actual spring named Fountain Rock is now on the southern edge of the campus of St. James School. Later land tracts, such as Marsh Head, surveyed for Redmund Follens in 1737 Surveyed September 1, 1737 on a warrant from Thomas Owen, MSA S1203-1495; Patent Certificate: 1413 (PG Co.), June 30, 1741 to Redman Falling, and Water Sink, surveyed for Joseph Tomlinson in 1739 stated explicitly later during Land Commission testimony; see Frederick County, Maryland Deeds M: 7, delineate by virtue of their names the original extent of the Marsh. These tracts may be appreciated in the more detailed map below.
Fountain Rock was not patented, perhaps because its metes and bounds intruded upon Conocoheague Manor. A similar fate may have befallen the Hickman family Hickmans, surveyed in 1739 for Edmund Cartledge. MSA S1226-189; Unpatented Certificate: 176 (PG Co.).
1737 - 1738
After 1736 the extant squirrel and crow tax lists became much more complete. Each year included 1) a list in alphabetical order of the people deficient in paying the tax and 2) a list prepared for the sheriff, in semi-geographical order, of the people still needing to pay. With these lists it is possible to identify the arrival of newer settlers to the Great Marsh area.
Joseph Chaplin
Joseph Chaplin, born 1709, had officially settled in central Maryland by 1735, as he is in the tax levy list shown above. He deserves special mention as he is the first member of the privileged class to physically settle in the region. Joseph's ancestry dates back to the Jamestown colony in 1610; the family moved to Maryland by 1651 Maria J. Ligget Dare, Chaplines from Maryland and Virginia, (published privately, 1902), 10 - 16. Joseph was born in eastern Prince Georges County in 1709 to William Chaplin and Elizabeth Travers. He came west a bachelor, marrying Ruhamah Williams in 1741 Edward C. Papenfuse, Biographical Dictionary of the Maryland Legislature 1635-1789, Arch Md. 426: 210-1. Her father, William Williams, was a Presbyterian minister in the frontier: his behavior was probably eccentric, as in 1745 across the Potomac in Frederick County, Virginia he was fined £4 and costs for "joyning in the holy bonds of matrimony several persons, he being no orthodox minister" and an additional 26 shillings for "behaving indeciently before the court" J. E. Norris, ed., History of the Lower Shenandoah Valley, Chicago: A. Warner & Co., 1980, 72.
Joseph Chaplin patented Rush Bottom in 1734 MSA S1203-1997; patented Certificate 1901 (PG Co.). This property, located at the mouth of Antietam Creek, is not where Chaplin's name is located on the 1736 map of the Potomac shown immediately above. Indeed, that map has has two sites for Chaplin, both labelled with his father's name. Joseph ultimately lived at Piles Delight, land surveyed in 1734 for Richard Sprigg MSA S1203-1788; patented Certificate 1694 (PG Co.) , son of a Maryland legislator who grew up in the same township as Chaplin Edward C. Papenfuse, Biographical Dictionary of the Maryland Legislature 1635-1789, Arch Md. 426: 760-1.
Unlike most of the other people living in frontier Maryland, Joseph Chaplin did possess three or four slaves according to the 1746 tax list for Antietam Hundred MSA SR 4543, transcription © Maryland Genealogical Society, 2014.
The Enochsons
The Enochs (Enoch, Enochs or Enochsson) family first appeared in the Prince George tax levies in 1736; John and Gabriel Enoch were listed for collection along with (in order) PG Co. Tax Levy A:85:
- Francis Hickman
- James Kendrick
- John Hearne
- Neal Friend
- John Friend
- Richard Mackfearson
- John Stuly
- John Upton
- Garrett Pendergrass
- Robert Ratcliffe
- Gabriel Enoch
- John Enoch
Gabriel and John Enochs were sons of Enoch Enochsson Peter S. Craig, "The Enochson Brothers and Their Swedish Descendants", Swedish Colonial News, 3 (3) ,2005. He had married Susanna Friend, daughter of Niels Friend, and had lived in Ridley Township, Chester County, Pennsylvania until 1725 before settling in Raccoon Creek, New Jersey. It seems likely that Gabriel and John settled just to the east of their Friend cousins, as the 1737 survey for Astills Delight Astills Delight, surveyed for Isaac Astill June 11,1737, MSAS1203-253; Patent Certificate: 191 (PG Co.), Sept 29, 1750 to Hugh Parker began at a "bounded red oak standing on the South side of a branch called Enochsons branch within a mile of Conogosheige Creek". Gabriel and John would survey Enochsons Lott Enochsons Lott, to , surveyed April 16, 1739 for Gabriel Enochson, MSA S1203-843; Patent Certificate: 771 (PG Co.), July 12, 1739 and Enouchsons Delight Enochsons Delight, to , ssurveyed 1 Jan 1741/2 for John Enochson, MSA S1203-842; Patent Certificate: 770 (PG Co.), Feb 13, 1744in 1739 and 1741/2 respecitvely; these contiguous properties are located on the map below.
There is one other family in the various tax levy lists above that was related to the Friends and the Enocchsons in Ridley Township, Chester County. John and Edward Nichols were the sons of Amos Nichols, who had married Sarah Friend, another daughter of Niels Friend. In addition John Nichols married Anna Enochson, sister of Gabriel and John Enochson. It is not clear if John or Edward Nichols ever patented land in central Maryland. But later testimony by Matthias Nichols in a case involving the watercourse of Enochson's Creek showed that a Nichols family probably lived on the Enochson property until about 1750 Wash. Co., Md. deeds G: 213. An Edward Nichols ultimately rented land in the southeast corner of Conocogeague Manor in 1753 Fred. Co., Md. deeds E: 214,leaving by 1765 Gaius Marcus Brumbaugh, Maryland Records, Colonial, Revolutionary, County and Church from Original Sources, (Lancaster Press, Inc., Lancaster, PA: 1928) ii: 43-6. It is quite possible that this Edward Nichols is the same person who Thomas Perrin sued in Lancaster County in 1732.
1737 Levy Records
The 1737 levy lists are the first appearance for John Perins. In the alphabetical list of those persons deficient in paying that tax he is listed as "John Perns" PG Co. Tax Levy A:97; I believe this is a transcription error made when copying the original list to the levy book. But it may easily reflect an unfamiliarity with that previously unknown surname. When the lists were made for the sheriff to collect, the following order of names occurred PG Co. Tax Levy A:118:
- John Royall
- Peter Cox
- John Pedons
- John Upton
- William Clark
- Henry Enochson
- Anderson Justin
- Daniel Macgloling
- John Enochson
- Gabriel Enochson
This portion of the levy list clearly is of people living in the Great Marsh region; the names Royal and Clark go back to the Blunston letter above. Here the Enochson brothers John and Gabriel are present along with Henry Enochs (Enochson), their cousin from Kingsessing, a Swedish settlement on the west bank of the Schuykill River next to Philadelphia Peter S. Craig, "The Enochson Brothers and Their Swedish Descendants", Swedish Colonial News, 3 (3),.
John Pedons in this list is most certainly John Perins. This spelling does not occur at any other time in central Maryland, and I will argue later that this is a phonetic rendering of Perins' name. But the association of Perins with Henry Enochs and John Upton is reinforced by another event in late 1737.
Death of a Salesman
Prince Georges County filed the following document, dated October 24, 1737, with the Prerogative Court of Maryland PG Co.Register of Wills, Original Administration Bonds, Samuel Finley, MSA C1147-10, box 10, folder 5:
Know all Men by these Presents, That We Henry Enoch, John Upton, and John Perrin of Prince Georges County Planters are held and firmly bound unto the Right Honourable the Lord Proprietary of this Province, in the full and just Sum of Three hundred Pounds Sterling Money of Great-Britain, to be paid to His said Lordship, his Heirs and successors:
To which Payment well and truly to be made and done, We bind our selves, and every of us, our and every of our Heirs, Executors, and Administrators, in the whole, and for the whole, jointly and severally, firmly, by these Presents. Sealed with our Seals, and dated this Twenty fourth Day of October in the twenty third Year of His saids Lordship's Dominion, &c. Annoq; Domini 1737
The condition of the above Obligation is such, That if the above bound Henry Enoch Administrator of all and singular the Goods and Chattles, Rights and Credits, of Samuel Finley late of Prince Geroges County, Deceased, do make, or cause to be made, a true and perfect Inventory of all and singular the Goods, Chattles, and Credits, of the said Deceased, together with a List of the Debts, sperate and desperate, which have or shall come to the hands Possession or Knowledge of the said Henry Enoch or into the Hands, Possession, or Knowledge, of any other person; for him and the same so made, do exhibit or case to be exhibited, into the Prerogative Court at Annapolis, at or before the Twenty fourth Day of January next ensuing. And the same Goods, Chattles, and Credits, and all other the Goods, Chattles, and Credits, of the said Deceased, at the Time of his Death, that shall come to the Hands, Possession, or Knowledge, of the said Henry Enoch or to the Hands, Possession or Knowledge, of any other Person, for him do well and truly administer, according to Law, viz. Shall pay the Debts of the said Deceased, so far forth, as his Personal Estate shall extend, and the Law will charge, as also all such reasonable Charges and Fees as have arisen, or shall arise or become due to His Lordship's Officers, from the said Henry Enoch on Account of the said Deceased, or his Estate: And further, do make, or cause to be made, a true and just Account of his Administration, at or before the twenty fourth Day of October next. And all the Rest and Residue of the said Goods, Chattles, and Credits, which shall be found remaining upon the said Administrators Account, the same being first examined and allowed of by the Judge or Judges for the Time being, shall deliver and pay unto the Person or Persons appointed by Law to receive the same. And if it shall hereafter appear that any Last Will and Testament was made by the said Deceased, and the Executor or Executors therein named, do exhibit the same into the said Court, making Request to have the same allowed and approved accordingly, if the said Henry Enoch being thereunto required, do render and deliver the said Letters of Administration, (Approbation of the said Testament being first had and made,) in the said Court: Then this Obligation to be void, and of no Effect; or else to stand, remain, and, be in full Force, Power, and Virtue, in Law.
Sealed and delivered Henry Enoch (seal) in Presence of Us John Upton (seal) John Perren (seal) John Gibson Wm Rogers
This document appointed Henry Enoch as administrator (executor) for the estate of Samuel Finley, deceased. Enoch as well as Upton and Perins were liable for a three hundred pound bond if he did not perform this task within a year. Below is a photograph of the signatures from the original document.

Signatures from Samuel Finnly's Administration Bond
Four months later Henry provided more information to the Court Maryland Will Book DD1 21: 846.
Henry Enoch & Joseph Metcalf of Prince Georges County Planters being duly Sworn severlly depose & Swear tht they were at the late Dwelling house of Samuel Finnly late of the said County Merchant Dec'ed on the Sixteenth day of October last past & that the said Finnly then lay sick in bed & desired this Deponent Henry to mind what he the said Finnly was then going to say And afterwards said Henry afsd I leave all I have to Johny Aldridge or words to that effect Which words the Dep. Joseph heard the said Finnly speak. That there was no other present when the said Finnly spoke the said words but these Deponents And that he the said Finnly died of that sickness with four or five days after speaking the said words And that the best of their judgement & Apprehension the said Finnly at the time of speaking the said words was perfectly in his Senses
Sworn to Feb 2 1737 [1737/8] before me D Dulany Commsr.
Signed Henry Enoch, Joseph Metcalf (his mark)
The above deposition was taken at the Instance of Joseph Chaplin to avail as much as in law & Justice it might, which to that end I hereby order to be Entered in the Porceedings of the Perogative office
Feb 2 1737 D Dulany Commsr
(This statement is very helpful. The estimated date of death for Finley is October 20. Only four days later the fisrt administration bond was filed in Maryland at Upper Marlboro in Prince Georges County. The trip from the Great Marsh to the county seat, fifty miles, in four days is as fast as I would expect on the frontier. I would argue that only Henry Enochs made the trip, and that he signed the names of Upton and Perren on the document himself. Certainly the three signatures seem to be the same style of writing.)
On the same date that Enoch deposed Finley's will he relinquished his position as administrator for the Finley estate PG Co. Register of Wills, Original Administration Bonds, Samuel Finley, MSA C1147-10, box 10, folder 6, giving it to Joseph Chaplin. I imagine Chaplin pointed out to Enochs that he could not administer an estate when he was one of the two persons who had actually heard Finley's will. The wording of the Court document implies to me that Chaplin specifically wanted to clear up any confusion.
Samuel Finley was originally from Chester County, Pennsylvania. He paid taxes there from 1718 until 1732 Chester Co., PA Archives, Tax Index, https://www.chesco.org/DocumentCenter/View/46792/1715-1764-Chester-County-Tax-Index-D-I; in 1736 he was deficient in the crow's head tax in Prince Georges CountyPG Co. Tax Levy A:94. After his death there were parallel estate proceedings in Pennsylvania and Maryland. On October 29, 1737 brother Robert Finley filed to administor Samuel's estate in Pennsylvania Chester Co., Pa. Archives, Probate File 614, October, 1737 - Samuel Finley, Nottingham, administration bond and inventory. Samuel's Pennsylvania inventory consisted of 124 yards of linen and 36 deer skins, plus some cash. The Maryland estate inventory included household goods, another 180 yards of linen, 23 horses (including 5 colts) and other livestock PG Co. Register of Wills PD: 399-400, MSA C1228-3. His list of debtors showed that Henry Enochs was his biggest creditor; Finley owed him £35; PG Co. Register of Wills (Administration Accounts, Original) Box 1, folder 56, MSA C1145-1. All of this suggests that Finley was a trader; perhaps Enochs had been financing him.
Little is known about Johnny Aldridge or Allred; he was a minor of Chester County Chester Co., Pa. Orphan's Book III:69 who petitioned their Orphan's Court to have Joseph Chaplin become his guardian. Second witness Joseph Metcalf later patented land (the 1739 survey states that it was "by ye Side of a little Spring within half a mile of ye Waggon Road that goes from Stulls Mill to ye Mountain" Midcafs Meadow, 100 acres, surveyed for Jos. Midcaf Sept 21, 1739, MSA S1203-1536; Patent Certificate: 1453 (PG Co.), October 3, 1740), but nothing more is known about this man.
John Upton, the other guarantee for Henry Enoch's administration bond, was in western Maryland as of 1733 Maryland State Papers No. 1, The Black Books, paragraph 272. There is more to say about Upton later; for now this document links Enochs, Perins and Upton to the same place, much as the 1737 squirrel and crows levy lists did above.
1738 - 1739

Central Washington County, Maryland in 1739
The probable extent of the Great Marsh is shown in light blue
Roads are as established much later
The year 1738 is the last year I have seen of the squirrel and crow tax lists. John Perins can be found in both the alphabetical (as John Perron PG Co.Tax Levy A:136) and collection (as John Perins PG Co.Tax Levy A:158) lists.
The most significant event for 1738 occurred not in the frontier but in Annapolis. Immediately after Maryland lost the boundary war with Pennsylvania the issuance of warrants for western Maryland land increased. First to benefit from this change in policy was Thomas Cresap whose initial warrants totalled 1300 acres Md. Land Office Warrants FF: 325, 351. (You may tire of hearing about Cresap, but his flamboyant life resulted in a lot of published information about this part of the world which I will continue to cite. He ultimately settled at the forks of the Potomac, at the site of an abandoned Shawnee Indian village called Oldtown. Please see the next section.)
The Land Office also issued warrants to the person who had spearheaded the "Chester County Plot", Charles Higginbothom (300 acresMd. Land Office Warrants FF: 342). Other early recipients of warrants were George Bond (300 acres Md. Land Office Warrants FF: 352), John Charleton (600 acres Md. Land Office Warrants FF: 342) and James Henthorn (300 acres Md. Land Office Warrants FF: 353); they all were participants in the "Chester County Plot" Md. Land Warrant Index Libers FF and LG A, MSA SM129-2; Pennsylvania Archives Colonial Records IV: 101-2. Finally, others living in the Great Marsh now succeeded in buying warrants, for example John Upton (100 acres Md. Land Office Warrants FF: 334).
Petition to form a County, 1739
In early 1739 a petition was circulated in the region around the Great Marsh requesting the formation of a new county. The records of the House of Assembly in Maryland show that this petition was received in May, 1739 and subsequently not acted upon Arch. Md. 40: 219. I have transcribed it below Calendar of Maryland State Papers. The Black Books, IX, 61; the text is taken from the original document at the Maryland State Archives. The original resides at the Archives of Maryland, and a low resolution scan of a copy from there can be viewed here.
To his Excellency Samuel Ogle Esq Governor of Maryland and To the Hon'ble: the Upper and Lower Houses of Assembly now Convened ____
The Petition of the Subscribers hereof Freeholders and Inhabitants of the back Parts of Prince Georges County ____________
Most Humbly Sheweth.
That some of the back Inhabitants of the said County Did by their humble Petition at the Court Convention pray for a Division of the same County, but did not set forth where the Town & Courthouse for it should be erected; but your Honours being Informed most of the Petitioners were not Freeholders nor persons of any repute, and also for other Causes, Your Honours were pleased to Deferr the Conisderation thereof to this assembly.
Wherefore your said Petitioners being all Freeholders of the back Settlements and a Place (of by your Honours Incouraged) will in a small time Arise to such perfection as will be a Perfect Service as well to the right Hon'ble the Lord Propr't of the Province in general Inasumch as their sole Aim being based upon Farming Corn Industry of great [record torn here] altho' little followed in this part / and not on Tabacco / altho' a Country very Capable of producing the same which would Consequently Glutt the Merketts more than they now are.
And in their present Situation they Labour under great Hardships and Difficulties the present Court of Judicature being from most of your Petitioners & sundry other of the Inhabitors is from 120 to 200 Miles Distance, & that even by the articles lately Entered into between the People of the Province & Pensilvania the distance will Extend 100 Miles more back than any of the now Inhabitants,
and that many Idle Vagabonds Come among us & Steal Horses Cows & other of our Goods & properties & altho' some of them should be Detented in the Jail the party would rather Chose to be our the loss of such goods or Chattels so Stole or Suffer the fellon to Escape than to be out the great trouble & Expance to come to Piscattaway to prosecute such Fellon as well as be Subject to the loss of any Debt / without any Consideration / rather than be at the fatigue & Expence in Applying to the new Court of Judicature for Justice besides the great Trouble & Expence to Journey to Attend also great a distance & paying Taxes
Especially the Clergy where we have not the Happiness of having the Gospel read or preached to us which is partly a Means of persons of a Single Parish not Setting Among us & also that many of the back Inhabitants are much Disatisfied by Sheriffs who never come or Send to their Houses nor Demand or Deliver any account of Officers fees or other Taxes but if they should happen to Come to Court about their lawfull Occupation that then they are taken in Question or otherwise Committed for fees placed & which till then they know nothing of & are there Detained until they pay such Exorbitant price for such fees placed being in Tobacco as the Sheriff shall please to Demand besides the great Expence of Prison and other Officers fees on that Account we can be manifestly made appear by many of the back Inhabitants settled always ready & willing to pay any Demands that is lawfully due from them & many other Hardships & Difficulties we now Labour under which would be too tedious to Inumerate herein ____________
Your Petitioners therefore most humbly pray your honours to take the Decision into your most prudent Consideration & give them relief by a Division of the said County where & in what part and in Your Wisdom shall seem meet & that if your honours should agree to pass an Act for such Division Your Peti'ers humbly pray the Town and Courthouse may be Erected on or about a place Called Salsbury Plain near Connogoeling & Your Peti'ers humbly apprehending the same to be the most Convenient Inasmuch as where the Divisional Line / as your Peti'ers humbly presume / may & will not Exceed 45 Miles from the now Proposed Courthouse & that the Distance win as far as the Settlements now are back is not less than 100 Miles ___________
And Your Petitioners are in Duty Bound will Ever Pray
Ch[arles]s Higinbotham Van Swearingen Isaac Simonet Redmond Follon George Forbush John Enochs Jacob Yarbbi John Hullum Edward Doson (M) John Jones John Georgarnel Humberstone Lyon Flower Swift Nic[hola]s Catton John Stoll John Charlton Peter Bamgarner (M) Adam Shirrell (M) John Frend Arthur Charlton Sam[ue]ll Quick Nelle Frend Edward Charlton Isaac Arttrell (?) Johann Haerp Kirshner John Charlton, Junior James Bassford Willi[a]m Wyvill Peter Rentch(?) [with more signatures on the back of the petition]
Gabriel Enochs Ja[me]s Dickson James Walen Richard Christian (M) Geo[rge] Bond John Rutter Samuel Harwood (M) John Darling Richard Lain James Spurgin (M) John McCoy Tho[ma]s Anderson John Perins Daniel McCoy Charle[s] Chaney James Bedliome (M) Charles Frend (M) Miles Roberts Enoch Enochs son Jerimyah Jack Vail McGullian Nicholas Rhoades George Parker George Mills (M) Thomas Waller Thomas Harges David Jones Robert Kendle Charles Poke James Posththwait Tho[ma]s Jones Thomas Neale Thomas Cherry Joseph Tomlinson Tho[ma]s Barwick David Cox David Kannady Rich[ard] Christian Peter Studenbaker Richard Vormemaur(?) W[illiam] Allexander Henry Friggs George Derumpel John Davis Elisiah Allexander Joseph Chapline William Blear John Williams John Heller Providence Williams Charles Keller William Ramey Felty Crowl John W Smith Phillop Davy Reice Price Roberd Downe William Downy Joseph Perry
The first person to sign this petition was Charles Higginbotham; judging from the script he also wrote it. The 89 signatures extend to the back of the document, and I include here a portion of that page.

Portion of signatures on page two of the 1739 petition
The signature of John Perins in the middle left column is particularly clear. Note that his writing is not refined. As I will continue to stress. the signature includes a final "s", and only one "r". Aside from Finley's administration bond above, this spelling is how Perins signed his name in all the documents that I have physically or digitally observed .
The text of the document has some peculiar wording, but there are some interesting points made.
- The petitioner noted that this was not the first request made by the region. He also stated that no tobacco was grown there; the significance of this argument is that, as tobacco was accepted as currency in the colony, there would be no inflation as a result of more settlement there.
- The place proposed for a new court house was Salisbury Plain; this will not be built until Washington County was formed from Frederick County in 1776.
- There is one extended sentence concerning law enforcement: "many of the back Inhabitants are much Disatisfied by Sheriffs who never come or Send to their Houses nor Demand or Deliver any account of Officers fees or other Taxes but if they should happen to Come to Court about their lawfull Occupation that then they are taken in Question or otherwise Committed for fees placed & which till then they know nothing of & are there Detained until they pay such Exorbitant price for such fees placed being in Tobacco as the Sheriff shall please to Demand". This was probably a reference to the crow and squirrel head levy.
- One woman, Providence Williams, daughter of Rev. William Williams, signed the petition.
Land Patents
1739 did prove to be a turning point in the settlement of central Maryland. Applications for land warrants were approved at a rate three times greater than in 1737-8. The people who received warrants in 1738 started surveying land. Thomas Cresap submitted surveys for 1200 acres in three parcels on June 14, 1739 1. Skio Thorn, 370 Acres, MSA S1203-2090, patented certificate 1993 (PG Co.), 2. Long Meddows, 550 Acres, >MSA S1203-1418, patented certificate 1338 (PG Co.), 3. Forest of Needwood, 300 acres, MSA S1203-923 patented certificate 852 (PG Co.). While typically survey approval by the Land Commission took six to twelve months, his were approved in 2 days. His first land lay on the Potomac between Antietam and Conocogeague Creeks, but he later patented land at an old Shawnee village site near the forks of the Potomac, a placed called Old Town Indian Purchase 330 Acres, MSA S1203-1216, patented certificate 1143 (PG Co.), surveyed May 12, 1742 and patented July 28,1742 and The Indian Field, 250 Acres, > MSA S1203-1215, patented certificate 1142 (PG Co.), surveyed May 12, 1742 and passed Sept 7, 1742 . Here he settled; more about this place later.
Similar behavior was shown by the other Chester County Plot participants. Higgenbotham (now an honorary Captain of the Maryland militia) surveyed three 100 acre tracts: Dutch Folly April 5,1739 MSA S1203-784, patented certificate 713 (PG Co.), Charltons Fancy April 19 MSA S1203-556, LG C: 82; patented certificate 487 (PG Co.), and Charlemount April 20 MSA S1203-547; patented certificate 478 (PG Co.). In 1740 he sold both Dutch Folly and Charltons Fancy PG Co. Deeds Y:144, 146, settling on Charlemont for his residence.
Interestingly, Higgenbotham had surveyed Charlemount once before, on November 7, 1738 MSA S1226-89; Unpatented Certificate 82 (PG Co.); that survey was rejected as being too large. Its survey began "at the head of a plane called Uptons Meadow". While the 1739 survey for Charlemount did not include this description, it must have impinged upon Upton's land, for when he submitted a May 4, 1739 survey to patent It Is Well It is Well, 100 acres, surveyed for John Upton May 4, 1739, MSA S1226-194: Unpatented certificate: 181 (PG Co,) it was rejected by the Land Commission. As Upton's survey stated the land was "on the South Side of the Eastern branch of the great marsh of Cogonocege and below the Dweling house of the said upton", and that "on this Land is one loggd dwelling house & a dry fundement and two small Corn Fields under tenie" it seems at the least unjust that Higginbotham would make a land grab such as this. Upton probably left the region at this point, as he resurfaced in Frederick County, Virginia. By 1742 he had a mill on the South Fork of the Potomac in present day Hampshire County, Virginia Orange Co., VA Court Orders, 3: 395  and was appoiinted a constable of the newly formed Frederick County, Virginia in 1743 J. E. Norris, ed., History of the Lower Shenandoah Valley, Chicago: A. Warner & Co., 1980, 72.
One other Chester Plot member deserves mention at this point: John Henthorne, also spelled "Hawthorne". He surveyed Saint John, 100 acres, on Feb 8, 1729 MSA S1203-2004; Patented Certificate 1908 (PG Co.) ; the survey began at "Hickory Saplin Standing on a hil to the East Side of the Waggon Road that Leeds from potomack river by Stulls mill & near Capt. Higenbothams". Henthorn also patented 100 acres of land at the mouth of Tonoloway Creek in 1739 called Hawthorns Rest MSA S1203-1117, surveyed 22 Sept, 1739, patent certificate 1046 (PG Co.);.
John Perins surveyed Perrins Adventure (100 acres) on November 20, 1739 MSA S1203-1766; Patent Certificate : 1672 (PG Co.), October 20, 1740. The warrant for the land was assigned over from Richard Snowden by an agent on August 29, 1739; it was presumably purchased from him. Below is a complete transcription of the patent, which I include only for completeness.
Know ye that for and in consideration that John Perrin of Prince Georges County in our said Province of Maryland hath due unto him one hundred acres of land within our said Province whereof an Assignment for that Quantity from Richard Snowden part of a warrant for thirteen hundred and sixty nine acres granted the said Snowden by renewment the sixth day of June seventeen hundred and thirty nine as appears in our Land Office upon such conditions and terms as are expressed in our conditions of plantations of our said province bearing date the fifth day of April sixteen hundred and eighty four and remaining upon Record in our said province together with such alterations as in them are made by our further Conditions bearing date the fourth day of December sixteen hundred and ninety six
Together also with the Alterations made by our Instructions bearing date at London the twelfth day of September seventeen hundred and twelve and registered in our said Land Office of our said Province
We Do therefore hereby grant unto him the said John Perrin all that Tract or parcel of Land call Perrin's Adventure
Beginning at a bounded White Oak standing near the end of Chew's Mannor and running thence south fifty degrees east one hundred and thirty perches then north thirty degrees east eighty perches then north twenty six degrees west two hundred and seventeen perches then by a straight line to the beginning Tree containing and now laid out for one hundred acres of land according to the Certificate of Survey thereof taken and returned into our Land Office bearing date twentieth day of November seventeen hundred and thirty nine and there remaining together with all Rights profits benefits and privileges thereunto belonging Royal mines excepted
To have and to hold the same unto him the said John Perrin his heirs and assigns forever to be holden of us and our heirs as of our mannor of Calverton in fee and common soccage by fealty only for all manner of services
Yielding and paying therefore yearly unto us at our Receipt at our City of St. Mary's at the two most usual feasts in the year viz ~ the feast of the Annunciation of the blessed virgin Mary and St. Michael the Arch Angel by even and equal portions the rent of four shilling sterling in silver or Gold and for a fine upon every Alienation of the said Land or any part or parcel thereof one whole years rent in silver or Gold or the full value thereof in such Commodities as we and our heirs or such Officer or Officers as shall be appointed by us and our heirs from time to time to collect and receive the same shall accept in discharge thereof at the choice of us and our heirs or such Officer or Officers aforesaid provided that if the said sum for a fine for Alienation shall not be paid unto us & our heirs of such Officer or Officers aforesaid before such Alienation entered upon Record either in the provincial Court or County Court where the same parcel of land lyeth within one month next after such Alienation then the said Alienation shall be void and of no Effect
Given under our Great Seal of our said Province of Maryland this twenty eighth day of October Anno Domi seventeen hundred and forty
Witness our trusty and well beloved Samuel Ogle, Esq. Lieutenant General and Chief Governor of our said province Chancellor and Keeper of the Great Seal thereof
Sam Ogle, Chancellor
Resurveys of Perrins Adventure MSA S1203-1767; Patent Certificate: 1673 (PG Co.), December 4, 1747, Charlemount MSA S1203-548; Patent Certificate: 479(PG Co.) and Saint John MSA S1203-2005; Patent Certificate: 1909 (PG Co.) were performed later in the decade. All of the resurveys were performed by Thomas Cresap who had become the principal surveyor for the region. With resurvey the tracts were contiguous and can be accurately plotted below.

Map detail: Early land tracts along the Great Marsh. First surveys are outlined in dashed lines
Dotted yellow line: Chew's Manor; dotted purple line: Conocoheague Manor
Accurate location of these properties on a modern road map is possible as modern deeds Wash. Co., MD deeds 539: 340, April 3, 1972 and Wash. Co., MD MS plat 5102, Lot 1, August 6, 1996 give a location for Perrins Adventure relative to current roads. Then a later "fill in" tract called Number FourMSA S1197-3143; Patent Certificate 2821-107 (Fred. Co.), March 7, 1769 from 1769 showed where Perrins Adventure intersected with Conocoheague Manor (the original survey for Perrins Adventure only stated that the land was near the end of Chews Manor). The resurveys of Perrins Adventure and Charlemount overlappedMSA S1203-548; Patent Certificate: 479 (PG Co.), December 4, 1747. This overlap was resolved in a later agreement filed in 1806 PG. Co. Deeds S: 36, so the placement of these two tracts next to each other seems certain. Charlemount and Saint John 7MSA S1203-2004; Patent Certificate: 1908 (PG Co.), November 13, 1740. Resurvey: MSA 1203-2005; Patent record BY & GS 5: 532; Patent Certificate: 1909 (Prince George's County), March 25, 1751 may be placed courtesy of another later "fill in" tract called Number TwoMSA S1197-3141; Patent Certificate 2821-105 (Fred. Co.), March 7, 1769. See also MSA S1570-296.
The nearby tract, Water Sink, patented by Joseph Tomlinson in 1739 MSA S1203-2353; Patent Certificate 2258 (PG Co.) can be placed from later deeds Washington Co., MD deeds IN 11: 644 and 227: 558. As the later Resurvey of Water Sink in 1753 corrected its western border with Chews Manor MSA S1197-4403, Patent Certificate 3983 (Fred. Co.) the positioning of Chews Manor is accurate as well.
There are two other properties shown on the above map. The survey for Number Four delineated the eastern edge of Conocoheague Manor up to a property named Good FortuneMSA S1197-1673, GS 5:122, Patent certificate 1608 (Fred. Co.). This, plus the contiguous NeglectMSA S1197-3100, patent certificate 2797 (Fred. Co.), were patented by Catherine Mallot in 1755 after the death of her father Theodorus Mallotwill of Theodores Malott, Maryland Perogative Court, 28:117, MSA S538, proved March 19, 1751. I haave placed Fountain Rock on this map on the basis of a later resurvey of Peter's Delight in 1791 MSA S12088-744; Patent certificate 693 (Wash. Co.).
Now is a good time to mention some hints about geography contained in the land records. The southern portion of the Resurvey of Watersink was sold to Christian Eversole in 1755 Fred. Co. Deeds E: 777 who by 1769 had built a mill on the property Fred. Co. Deeds M: 7-9. Another tract of land, Hallums Look Out, which was surveyed between Perrins Adventure and Watersink, also refers to this portion of the Marsh, as its survey began "at a bounded Hickory Tree standing on the North Side of Carters Marsh on ye east Side of the Great Marsh" MSA S1203-1092; surveyed November 13, 1752, Patented certificate 1021 (PG Co.)The original survey for Charlemount stated that its beginning line was about fifty perches east of the "Deep Spring" Charlemount: MSA S1203-547, Patent Certificate 478 (PG Co.). I can imagine that spring at the top of the smaller middle lobe of the Great Marsh. While building in the marsh may have been foolish, the marsh may easily have been seasonal and would have provided settlers with well watered meadow for cultivation or grazing. In contrast, a later survey for Dry Fountain referred to "the Barrons between Capt. Charles Hikenbothams and Antiatum" Dry Fountain, MSA S1197-1252; patented certificate 1188 (Fred.Co.), surveyed for John Darnal August 19, 1754, implying to me that the land between the marsh and Antietam Creek was not particularly desirable.
1740 - 1749
Neighbors
While several of Perins' neighbors are represented on the above map, several more who arrived in the 1730s and 1740s deserve mention. Along Antietam Creek John Stull built his mill very early Chris H. Bailey, "John Stull, Sr., the Miller" Western Maryland Genealogy 13 (1997): 99 - 109, his patented property Whiskey MSA S1203-2178; Patented Certificate 2081 (PG Co.) showing good use of the stream. Downstream from him were William Kelley (Tower Hill) MSA S1203-2270; Patented Certificate 2175 (PG Co.) and John McCoy (Neglect) MSA S1203-1624; Patented Certificate 1539 (PG Co.); the location of these tracts is illustrated above.
Arrival of the Lazears
Leasing of the Conocoheague Manor land began in 1737 with Van Swearingen, Senior leasing over 300 acres Gaius Marcus Brumbaugh, Maryland records, colonial, revolutionary, county and church: from original sources (Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1928), 2: 43, 45, 46 but after that year there are very few leases recorded for the next decade. I speculate that there was enough empty land outside of the Manor to make leasing there not as desirable to settlers. One exception was a lease to Joseph Lashier (Lazear) in 1745 Gaius Marcus Brumbaugh, Maryland records, colonial, revolutionary, county and church: from original sources (Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1928), 2: 46. This lease, for lot number 55 (120 acres) cannot be specifically placed on a map. But lot number 53, originally leased to Edward Nichols in 1753, can be located since the lease was recorded as a deed plus survey in Frederick County Fred. Co., Md. deeds E:214. The survey began at the most eastern point of the boundary between Conocogeague and Chews Manors, placing it within a stone's throw of Perrins Adventure.
More information can be found about the Lazear family in their appendix.
Legal Activities
There are only two more records for John Perins dating from the 1740s. On June 21, 1740 Perins received payment of a debt owed him by the estate of Robert Ratcliffe Administration Accounts, Prerogative Court of Maryland 17: 487; abstracted in V. L. Skinner, Abstracts of the administration accounts of the Prerogative Court (Westminster, MD: Family Line, 1995). Ratcliffe had been taxed in Monocosie Hundred in 1733 Maryland State Papers No. 1, The Black Books, paragraph 272 ; the survey for his land in 1737 began at a walnut tree "Standing in the Edge of the Great marsh & near the mouth of the Spring that the s'd Rattclif now lives by " Unnamed property, 109 acres, surveyed for Robert Ratcliffe, October 20, 1737, MSA S1226-102; Unpatented Certificate: 95 (PG Co.). This would make Ratcliffe a neighbor.
The second record was an estate inventory of the John Roberts by Thomas Kelley & John Perrin in 1747
1750 - 1755
By 1750 western Maryland had experienced significant change. The town of Frederick on Monocacy Creek had been established in 1745, reflecting a surge in population for that region. In the west there had been consensus with the Six Nations as to the limit of western settlement, in the form of an agreement in Lancaster, Pennsylvania in 1744. To quote the natives Susan Kalter, ed., Benjamin Franklin, Pennsylvania, and the First Nations: The Treaties of 1736-62, (Ubana, IL, University of Illinois Press, 2006), 106:
We are willing to renounce all Right to Lord Baltimore of all those Lands lying two Miles above the uppermost Fork of Potowmack or Cohongoruton River, near which Thomas Cressap has a hunting or trading Cabin, by a North-line, to the Bounds of Pennsylvania.
In 1751 there was a new map of western Maryland and Pennsylvanis that reflects the changes occuring since 1736. It still showed the "old Waggon Road to Philadelphia" that crossed the Potomac at the "Spurgent" residence, but gave precedence to a newer Waggon Road which crossed the Potomac upstream at Williamsport. To the west from Conocoheague and North Mountain there were people living at Little Tonoloway Creek. More about one of them, Charles Polk later. At Old Town Col. Thomas Cresap had settled.
The path between Charles Polk's residence (labelled "Pope" on the above map) and Old Town was traversed by young surveyor George Washington in March, 1747. The journal entry below begins when they were stuck at the Medicinal Springs on the Virginia side of the Potomac J. M. Toner, Journal Of My Journey Over the Mountains by George Washinton, (Albany, N. Y. , Joel Munsell’s Sons Publishers, 1892), 29 - 30.
Fryday 18th We Travell’d up about 35 miles to Thomas Barwicks on Potomack where we found y. River so excessivelly high by Reason of y. Great Rains that had fallen up about y. Allegany Mountains as they told us which was then bringing downy. melted Snow & that it would not be fordable for severall Days it was then above Six foot Higher than usual & was rising we agreed to stay till Monday we this day call’d to see y. Fam’d Warm Sptings we camped out in y. field this Night Nothing Remarkable happen’d till sonday y. 20th.
Sonday 20th finding y. River not much abated we in y. Evening Swam our horses over & carried them to Charles Polks in Maryland for Pasturage till y. next Morning.
Monday 21st We went over in a Canoe & Travell’d up Maryland side all y. Day in a Continued Rain to Coll. Cresaps right against y. Mouth of y. South Branch about 40 Miles from Polks I believe y. worst Road that ever was trod by Man or Beast.
New County Government
In December, 1748 Frederick County was formed from Prince Georges and Baltimore counties Arch. Md. 46:142; it comprised the Monocacy Valley as well as present day Washington County and further west. On March 1748/9 the first county appointments included Joseph Chaplin and Henry Munday as judges. Joseph Chaplin became one of four county representatives to the Maryland Assembly and Thomas Cresap was appointed justice of the peace Millard Milburn Rice, This Was the Life: Excerpts from the Judgment Records of Frederick County, Maryland, 1748-1765 (Baltimore, MD: Genealogical Publishing Co., 2002), 1. John Perrin was appointed grand juror March, 1748/49; March, 1751 and November, 1753 Millard Milburn Rice, This Was the Life: Excerpts from the Judgment Records of Frederick County, Maryland, 1748-1765 (Baltimore, MD: Genealogical Publishing Co., 2002), 1, 91, 126.
I can speculate that Perins was selected for grand jury duty on the basis of a recommendation from Higginbotham. He was also associated with this neighbor on other legal documents:
- On October 9, 1749 John Perins and James Bearon witnessed that William and Lidia Flitham of Antietam Hundred sold Neglect,150 acres for 100 pounds to Charles Higginbotham. They also sold him fifteen acres of corn, four horses and all the livestock, furniture and even a saddle Fred. Co. Deeds B: 82-84
Estate Inventories
Perins became involved with several other neighbors' estates in this period. For some of these people I do not have additional information.
- On October 25, 1749 The will of Daniel Stull was witnessed by John Perins, Jonathan Heger and Ja[mes]. Smith, with the proved by Perin and Hagar in November 1749.Md. Prerogative Court Book 27: 107; Abstracted online at http://www.msa.md.gov/msa/stagser/s500/s538/html/s538-27.htm. Daniel Stull died shortly after his father John, the founder of Stull's Mill. Joseph Hager, the other witness, later built his own mill upstream and founded Hagerstown. Daniel Stull's estate was assessed by John Perins and his neighbor James Henthorne Md. Prerogative Court Book 72: 184' abstracted in V. L. Skinner, Abstracts of the inventories of the Prerogative Court of Maryland (Westminster, MD: Family Line, 1988).
- On January 17, 1750 the will of Theodores Malott named John Perrin executor. The will was witnessed by Joseph and Joseph Jr. Lazer text at http://files.usgwarchives.net/md/frederick/wills/malott-t.txt. Perins served as the executor for the estate in 1752 Wash. Co. (MD) wills TS 1: 328; text at http://files.usgwarchives.net/md/frederick/wills/malott-t.txt . Malott's family probably lived on Neglect, as Catherine Malott in 1755 patented that tract. Its survey began Neglect: MSA S1197-3100; Patent Certificate 2797 (Fred. Co.):
at a bounded White Oak standing on the East side of the Great Marsh about half a mile to the North West side of Conigohuge Chapple and running thence...About twenty acres of cultivated land whereon is about four thousand Fence Loggs and one Old Dwelling house Covered with Pine? thirty five feet by fifteen.
- On October 24, 1750 the William Foster estate was appraised by John Perins & John Moor. Prerogative Court of Maryland 44: 208; abstracted in V. L. Skinner, Abstracts of the inventories of the Prerogative Court of Maryland (Westminster, MD: Family Line, 1988)
- On June 15, 1752 the Peter Studebaker estate was appraised by John Perins & William Alexander.Prerogative Court of Maryland 54: 110; abstracted in V. L. Skinner, Abstracts of the inventories of the Prerogative Court of Maryland (Westminster, MD: Family Line, 1988)/li>
The last estate inventory Perins conducted in this period was that of Charles Higgenbothom himself on June 19, 1754 Prerogative Court of Maryland 58: 158; abstracted in V. L. Skinner, Abstracts of the inventories of the Prerogative Court of Maryland (Westminster, MD: Family Line, 1988). Higginbotham's estate inventory included three wigs, an unusual item of clothing for the frontier Prerogative Court of Maryland 58: 158; abstracted in V. L. Skinner, Abstracts of the inventories of the Prerogative Court of Maryland (Westminster, MD: Family Line, 1988).
Western Activities
John Perins started to become active on the frontier in the early 1750s. He first received a warrant for 300 acres of land in April, 1752 Indexed in MSA SM129-3 to TI 5: 320, 1752. In 1754 it was used to patent two tracts west of Tonoloway Creek, Flint's Chance and Long Looked For for a total of 200 acres.
Flint's Chance was patented by Joseph Flint; John Perins signed over 50 acres of his warrant to Flint on October 22, 1753 "for a Valuable Consideration" Flints Chance: MSA S1197-1476; Patent record GS 2: 358; Patent Certificate: 1413., Fr. Co. . Resurveyed for 258 acres March 12, 1762; MSA S1197-3855; Patent record BC & GS 20: 270 , Patent Certificate 3437, Fr. Co..
Know all Men by these Presents that I John Perryn of Frederick County in the Province of Maryland for a Valuable Consideration, I do Hereby Assign, Confirm, and Make over unto Joseph Flint of the aforesaid County and Province Fifty Acres of Land being Part of a warr't Granted to me out his Lordships Land office for Three Hundred Acres Barring Date Twenty Seventh Day of April Anno Domini 1752 ___ As Witness my Hand and seal this 22 Day of October 1753

John Perins signature from 1753
Joseph Flint may have originally come from the Rock Creek region of Maryland. He was cited for "riotous behaviour" along with Thomas Cresap in Pennsylvania in 1735 Pa. Arch. Series I, 1: 533-4. He witnessed the sale of Conquest to Cresap in 1745 PG Co. Deeds BB 1: 363. By 1752 he had already patented three tracts of land in Town Creek north of Oldtown, using warrants obtained by Thomas Cresap The tracts Morgans Chance, Morrises Chase and Grassey Bottom are discussed later.. I think it was likely Flint had a commercial relationship with Cresap Lyman Chalkley, Chronicles of the Scotch-Irish Settlement in Virginia, Extracted from the Original Court Records of Augusta County 1745 - 1800 (Roselyn, VA: The Commonwealth Printing Co., 1912), v. 1, 470. This particular entry concerns a suit between Thomas Cresap and Dr. Thomas Walker of Virginia concerning debts from 1754; it includes a receipt (unknown for what) from Joseph Flint to Cresap. Flint ultimately settled at Flints Chance and accumulated over 800 acres of land west of present day Hancock by 1783 MSA S1437, Tax Assessment of 1783, Index.
Long Looked For, surveyed in November 1754 Long Lookd For, MSA S1197-2575; Patent record BC & GS 5: 95; Patent Certificate 2502I, Fr. Co., was located two miles from Little Tonoloway Creek on Long Run. Its shape fits nicely into the upper valley for this stream, as shown on the map in the next section. The land would not be great for farming, but as it stood right on the footpath to Oldtown it could be well situated for a commercial enterprise.
Flint and Perins appraised the Charles Polk estate on January 27, 1754 Prerogative Court of Maryland 58: 99; abstracted in V. L. Skinner, Abstracts of the inventories of the Prerogative Court of Maryland (Westminster, MD: Family Line, 1988). Charles Polbg (Polk or Polke) was the son-in-law of Edmund Cartledge; he initially had worked as an Indian trader based in Conestoga Township, Lancaster County. He moved to the Little Tonoloway region on the Potomac by 1737 The life and times of Polk are best summarized in John G. Kester, "Charles Polke, The Indian Trader of the Potomac, 1703 - 1753", Maryland Historical Magazine 90 (1995): 443-63. Polk did not own any land in the region until 1746, when he bought Hawthorns Rest Prince George's Co. Deeds BB1: 426 from James Henthorne.
The sum of all of these activities suggests to me that John Perins intended to participate with Flint in trading or some other sort of venture in the frontier. John's participation may have been through his son Edward,given that Edward Perrin later became constable of the Linton Hundred.
Commentary
John Perins appeared in central Maryland around 1737; while he was not one of the earliest settlers to the region he did arrive before the area was officially opened to settlement. His association with Henry Enochs is suggestive but does not prove that Perins knew him before moving west. But unlike Enochs, who would not settle down until ten years later at the forks of the Capacon River in Frederick County, Virginia Frederick County (VA) Order Book 3: 24, February 8, 1748/9, Perins patented land early. By the 1750s Perins was active in county government and started to show interest in western expansion, possibly as a trader of sorts. This thread will become more significant in the next section where the remainder of Perins' life is outlined.